A Proposal for Advancing Columbia's (MO) Energy Future

 

The Social Cost of burning Carbon:

$36 per metric ton of Carbon Dioxide Released to the Atmosphere

 

 

John T. O’Connor, H2O’C Engineering, LLC, Columbia, MO

 

It was little noted, but on August 8, 2016, the Chicago-based 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals unanimously upheld the U. S. Department of Energy’s policy of including the social cost of carbon at $36 per metric ton when calculating cost-benefit analyses. (http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/290859-court-backs-obamas-climate-c hange-accounting.) This court ruling is newsworthy because it permits federal agencies to quantify, rather than ignore, the external costs of climate change.

An Editorial Assessment:

A Decade of ‘No Growth’ in Energy and Water Use is Good News for Columbia’s Economy

 

Tom O’Connor and John T. O’Connor, H2O’C Engineering, LLC, Columbia, MO

 

As it has for the nation as a whole, Columbia’s electrical usage has remained flat for the past decade. Even with a steadily growing population, Columbia’s per capita consumption declined from 32 kWh/d in 2006 to 27 kWh/d in 2015. This remarkable achievement may be a by-product of the adoption of new technology as well as community efforts to conserve and utilize electrical energy more efficiently.

 

If we can continue to use our resources more wisely, and thereby minimize the frequency of multi-million dollar utility system capacity expansions, Columbians will be richer for it in the long run.

To encourage the adoption of renewable energy resources nationwide, the U.S. government has reauthorized (though 2019) the substantial (30%) tax credit to those homeowners installing solar energy systems. In addition to that federal incentive, Columbia’s Water & Light Department (CW&L) offers a generous 50 cent per Watt rebate on solar installations. CW&L is the only electric utility in Missouri that offers such a rebate.

 

Considering these dual financial benefits, what might it cost a homeowner to install a typical 5,000 Watt (5 kW) residential solar system in Columbia Water and Light’s service area?

For the past year, I have been obsessively plowing through the waterworks literature, research reports, news articles, public health publications with recent data, histories [e.g., Brush with death: a social history of lead poisoning, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001], informal publications, blogs, reader comments, and, most intently, the results of Michigan’s official inquiry [Flint Water Advisory Task Force Final Report, March , 2016] related to the toxicant, lead - particularly in drinking water supplies.

 

Although admittedly from a distance of 629 miles (Columbia, MO to Flint, MI), I have been trying to learn what happened in the Flint, Michigan water system - and what water suppliers must learn from this distressing episode.

 

The story begins with the efforts of Michigan’s state-appointed emergency managers (EMs) attempting to reduce the expenditures, including that for water supply, of the poverty-stricken City of Flint which was in debt - and in financial receivership.      John T. O’Connor

 

 

Finally, challenging the reader to a ‘thought experiment’.

What kind of experiments would you propose to gain insight into whether observed elevated lead levels are influenced more by ‘physical disturbances’ or ‘chemical factors’, such as disinfectant concentration, depletion, and temperature?

The attached summary of research on water treatment processes, conducted at the Little Rock, AR. Municipal Water Works (LRMWW) from October 1993 to January 1996, may be of special interest to water treatment professionals.

 

The summary outlines the:

 

Evaluation of Water Treatment Plant Performances

Safe Drinking Water Act Compliance Assessments

and a review of Pilot Plant Start-Up and Operations.

 

 

 

Also attached is a 1994 technical presentation (ASCE-Environmental Engineering Division conference) detailing the results of studies of the Control of Microbial Water Quality in the Little Rock, Arkansas Distribution System.

 

Finally, The Effect of Seasonal Variations in Source Water Quality on Drinking Water Treatment Process Requirements is presented as part of an interpretation of USGS data on Lakes Winona and Maumelle.

 

 

For millennia, humans have sought out healthy sources of potable water - and worked to devise means for purifying dirty or polluted waters.

 

The earliest small-scale treatments often involved heating or boiling as well as rudimentary filtration, aeration, and storage. Even distillation was among the early techniques devised.

 

Mechanical means for water treatment (filtration) awaited the tools and materials provided by the industrial revolution.

Kitchen Tap.jpg

"What is the chlorine residual at your household tap?"


The answer may depend upon who is doing the sampling - and what answer they would prefer to see.


Any value from zero residual at the 'first draw' for your morning coffee to the distribution main's total residual can be recorded, depending on the volume of water drawn before sampling. Where household plumbing is flushed for three to five minutes before sampling, as recommended by the AWWA Committee on Bacteriological Sampling Frequency in Distribution Systems (1985), it is the distribution system main, and not the consumer's tap, which is being sampled.


Part of the reason your system might be purged before sampling is that it is always summer for your heated household plumbing. Warm temperatures encourage microbial growth, nitrification, oxygen depletion, chlorine depletion and, sometimes, corrosion of plumbing materials.


To purge microbial growth and their by-products, one is well-advised to run the water until it is as cool as the water in your water distribution main.


For the few that are interested in this microbially-mediated phenomena, the attached paper may explain why.



 

John Wiley & Sons, publishers of "Water Treatment Plant Performance Evaluations and Operations", 2009, has generously posted the following excerpts from this volume on their website, free for downloading.


The WTP Preface provides the outline and summarizes the 12 chapters of a volume created for water treatment plant operators and managers focussed on scientifically monitoring and improving plant process performance.


Perhaps of greatest scientific value in this release are the WTP Figures. This central element of the book provides 28 highly detailed, color micrographs of particles and organisms observed in water at various stages of collection and treatment. The descriptions accompanying each figure represent an attempt to put the information conveyed by each micrograph to practical operational use.


Appendix A (appA) describes the apparatus needed and basic procedures for conducting bacterial cell counts by epifluorescence microscopy.


Appendix B (appB) lists potential studies that a water utility might perform using microscopic particle analysis.


Appendix C (appC) starts with a discussion of operator responsibilities and operational data collection. This is followed by an extensive photographic tour of an operator 'making the rounds' to directly observe the functioning of the water treatment plant unit processes.

 

 

 

John O'Connor

Turbidity

Posted by John O'Connor Jul 16, 2015

Oper. Training.jpg

In the production of municipal drinking water, nothing is monitored more assiduously than turbidity.


Why is this so? Just what is turbidity? And why is this quality parameter so critical that it rates designation as a microbiological surrogate and primary drinking water standard?

 

Direct microscopic examination of drinking waters reveals that turbidity is caused by stuff - stuff that absorbs or scatters light. As you might imagine, light-scattering stuff may include silt, clay, cyanobacteria, precipitated carbonates, sulfides, metal oxides (e.g., rust and corrosion products), plant fibers and organic debris, microfloc, activated carbon 'fines', paint chips, nematodes, protozoans, cysts, bacteria, virus, ... (Oddly, while they may sometimes be present in large number, bacterial cells are so translucent that they contribute little to either the turbidity of natural - or treated drinking waters.)

 

The attached report, "The Effect of Lower Turbidity on Distribution System Water Quality", (AWWARF, 1993), includes analyses of sets of operational data from a broad range of major U.S. water utilities (Kansas City, MO; St. Louis, MO; St. Louis County (MO) Water Company; New Orleans, LA; Boston, MA; Baltimore, MD; New Haven, CT; Cleveland, OH; Louisville, KY; Dallas, TX; Phoenix, AZ; Oakland, CA; Los Angeles, CA; Metropolitan Water District of Southern California).  From this data, the seasonal relationship between each utility's treated ('finished') water turbidity and the frequency of recovery of total coliform and heterotrophic plate count (HPC) organisms in monitoring samples from the water distribution system could be determined.


Of special interest, a comparison of data from various utilities indicated a very distinct advantage in maintaining control over total coliform in the distribution system using chloramine as opposed to chlorine.

Attached is a listing of all posts to Water and Wastewater Slide Shows as of April 2016.

Some are for chemists, some for engineers, some for utility operators; all for downloading and use at your discretion.

We encourage your comments, especially if some of these posts have been helpful.

 

Lead Contamination of the Flint, Michigan Water Supply: A Distillation of Readily Available Information

Little Rock, AR., Municipal Water Works - 1996

Early History of Water Treatment

Kinetics of Chlorine Depletion and Microbial Growth in Household Plumbing Systems

Microscopy - for Water Treatment Plant Performance Evaluations

Turbidity

The Story of Bottled Water and other Slide Shows: iBook

Summary of Posts: 2010-2016

Bottled Water Exhibit: University of California-Davis (Video)

Water Chemistry

Water Softening by Precipitation with Lime

Taste and Odor Control at Bloomington, Illinois

Drinking Water Filtration: Replacement of GAC Caps at Bloomington, Illinois

What we can’t (or shouldn’t) put into our Sanitary Sewerage Systems

Anthropogenic Global Warming

A Drinking Water Supply Manifesto

20/20 (A video of 20 slides for 20 seconds each)

Control of Nitrification in a Water Distribution System

Air-Assisted Filter Backwash (Air Scour)

Virus in Water Supplies

Chlorine vs. Chloramine

Drinking Water Process Performance Evaluations

Total Organic Carbon - Health Effects

Total Organic Carbon Removal

Total Organic Carbon

Pharmaceuticals in Water and Wastewater

Wastewater Reclamation, Recovery and Reuse

Stream Biomonitoring

Methane in Ground Water

Household Electrical Energy Usage

Sustainability for Water Systems

Arsenic in Drinking Water

Pit Happens: Copper Corrosion in Household Plumbing

My Kitchen Tap versus My Refrigerator Dispenser

A Brief History of Human Waste Disposal - Part 6. The Future

A Brief History of Human Waste Disposal-Part 5. Wastewater Treatment

A History of Human Waste Disposal - Part 4. Sewage Treatment

A Brief History of Human Waste Management - Part 3: Sewerage

A Brief History of Human Waste Disposal - Part 2: Toilets

A Brief History of Human Waste Disposal-and its possible future.

The Story of Bottled Water

 

@The Sustainability Director of the University of California-Davis ran across my ACS 'Story of Bottled Water' presentation and wanted to create a display in the Student Union using my water bottles and slides. Thanks to him, I was able to clear out some space in my basement.


The attached video (m4v) of this display was appended to this post on July 19, 2015.

John O'Connor

Water Chemistry

Posted by John O'Connor Mar 13, 2014

Water Chemistry was developed as a primer for water and wastewater treatment plant operators. It introduced pC-pH diagrams for alkalinity and various acid-base systems encountered in natural waters. It illustrated the calculation of solubility of water treatment coagulants plus a number of USEPA-regulated metals. It provided sample data on removal of metals during wastewater treatment. It demonstrated oxidations and reductions of importance in water and waste treatment. It introduced the chemistry of carbon as viewed in water treatment regulations. It illustrated the chemistry of those well water sources influenced by microbial activity and reducing conditions in the ground - with an emphasis on the gases produced by microorganisms. It utilized bar diagrams to illustrate electroneutrality conditions. It provided previously unpublished data on the organic carbon content and occurrence of disinfection by-products (trihalomethanes) in Missouri drinking water sources and chlorinated supplies. It provided data on residual metals, hardness and sodium ions in finished drinking water supplies. It provided a unique set of data on the total bacterial cell counts enumerated in treated Missouri drinking waters.

Bloom - Soft.jpg

Water softening by precipitation with lime is widely practiced throughout the Midwestern United States. This slide show illustrates some of the treatment practices and classical equipment used by several municipal utilities.

Bloom - T&O2.jpg

Algal blooms, followed by low lake water temperatures in the early winter of 2004, led to taste-and-odor producing compounds in the influent to the drinking water treatment plant at Bloomington, Illinois. The operational procedures adopted to mitigate the taste-and-odor along with extensive data on the presence and removal of geosmin and 2-methyl isoborneol (MIB) are presented in this slide show.

 

A major finding was that water recovered from the lime sludge storage lagoons contributed significantly to the plant influent geosmin/MIB concentrations.

 

Since most geosmin/MIB removal occurred primarily during filtration through Bloomington's GAC-capped filters, laboratory studies were undertaken to determine how rapidly geosmin adsorption capacity might change with GAC service age. These results indicated that adsorption on virgin carbon was most effective in geosmin removal. Despite increased colonization with microorganisms, GAC became progressively less effective after one and two years in service.

 

It was decided that virgin carbon should best be installed in the autumn in preparation for winter taste-and-odor challenges.

Filter Blog

By date:
By tag:
close mobile menu