The Very Interested Reviewer

Document created by David Chesney on Aug 3, 2011
Version 1Show Document
  • View in full screen mode


A recent Ph.D. receives a journal article to review. It contains a proof in his area that leads him to think about and come up with a shorter, better procedure. Even if this does not affect his judgment on the publishability of the article, what can or should he do or say about his idea produced by the article?