On a recent exam I was asked to identify the mechanism when 1-bromo-1-methylcyclohexane was reacted with KOt-Bu in HOt-bu, no other conditions were given (temp, concentration, etc).
I inferred the lack of conditions to imply equal amounts of base and solvent at room temperature; I said E2; this was wrong. My professor explained that because the base was so bulky, the substrate was both tertiary and bulky, and the solvent was protic, a C+ would form before the base could "get" over to the substrate and this would proceed through an E1 mechanism.
I am having a difficult time understanding this explanation because it is my understanding that the conjugate acid of a strong base is often used as the solvent, that strong bulky bases will proceed through E2 (Hoffman) mechanism given a 1°, 2°, or 3° substrate, with 3° being the best (unless the substrate is a benzene or allylic which prefer E1).
I have found many examples using the same substrate and base, but without a solvent listed; they are all E2. I have found several references stating that sterics do not effect basicity. I have also found many examples of bulky 3° alkyl bromides, that are not 1-bromo-1-methylcyclohexane, reacting with KOt-Bu in HOt-Bu which proceed via E2.
Can anyone explain this and/or outline some guidelines for differentiating between E1 and E2 given similar scenarios?
I am reposting this because it was marked as answered, but has not been.
Any response would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you.
Ok... I’ll try to start this conversation by acknowledging that up to this point I have had 2 chemists & 2 different tutors explain that this reaction would likely proceed through E2 unless the concentration of the KOt-Bu was very low, or the temperature was high.
I am asking here to try and verify because I will be taking the ACS exam soon, and after that the PCAT &/or MCAT (who’s resources are where I found this substrate & base, without the solvent, proceeding via E2).
I both like and respect my professor, who has excellent credentials and experience. I don’t think he is mistaken, but if he is it’s just that, a mistake. I am not asking to dispute him, it is simply very important that I understand this for my own long term goals and successes.